CLINICAL EFFICACY OF NUCALA

NUCALA provides proven protection from flares1

72% of patients had zero flares vs 44% with placebo infographic

Primary endpoint results: Proportion of patients who experienced HES flare(s)* during the 32-week study or withdrew. NUCALA 28% vs placebo 56%, P=0.002.

*HES flare: Worsening of clinical signs/symptoms or increased eosinophils (on ≥2 occasions), resulting in an escalation/addition of oral corticosteroids (OCS) or cytotoxic or immunosuppressive therapy.

Pivotal study design

NUCALA increased time to first flare1

Time to first flare infographic: 66% reduction in the risk of flare statistic

Secondary endpoint results: 66% lower risk of first HES flare during the 32-week study or withdrew. NUCALA vs placebo (HR: 0.34; 95% CI: 0.18, 0.67, P=0.002).

Pivotal study design

CI=confidence interval; HR=hazard ratio.

Patients taking NUCALA reported improvement in fatigue1

Improvement in fatigue was based on Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Item 3, which asked patients to record their worst level of weariness/tiredness severity during the past 24 hours. BFI scale: 0=no fatigue to 10=as bad as you can imagine.1,2 Baseline median BFI Item 3 scores: NUCALA: 4.46; Placebo: 4.69.3

MEDIAN CHANGE FROM BASELINE IN BFI ITEM 3 AT WEEK 32
IN “WORST LEVEL OF FATIGUE IN THE PAST 24 HOURS”1

Median change from baseline in BFI Item 3 bar graphMedian change from baseline in BFI Item 3 bar graph

Secondary endpoint.
An MCID has not been established in the BFI for HES.

Pivotal study design

MCID=minimum clinically important difference.

Request a rep

Want to know more?

Request a rep

Eosinophil Reduction and MOA

EOSINOPHIL REDUCTION AND MOA

SEE HOW NUCALA WORKS

Patient with hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) standing in a classroom

ACCESS YOUR GATEWAY TO NUCALA ENROLLMENT FORM

GET PATIENTS STARTED

NUCALA (mepolizumab) adminstration and preparation image

AT-HOME OR IN-OFFICE DOSING & ADMINISTRATION

DISCOVER DOSING